Enterprises spend $200K to $2M a year maintaining brittle UiPath, Blue Prism, and Automation Anywhere scripts. Agents can do the work cheaper and more resiliently — but only if the runtime can pass your security review.
Every vendor UI change starts a ticket. Your automation COE spends most of its time repairing, not building.
Per-bot seats at $8K–$20K a year, whether the bot runs one hour a day or twenty-three.
Screenshots-on-failure is not an audit trail a modern regulator accepts.
Bots tied to specific Windows VMs in specific data centers. Moving a workload takes quarters.
Weeks of flowchart design for what a well-briefed agent does in minutes.
A small pool of certified RPA developers. Expensive, in short supply, and nearing retirement.
| Legacy RPA | Agents on BrowserAnvil | |
|---|---|---|
| Handles a UI change | Breaks. Developer ticket. | Adapts at runtime; flags the drift. |
| Cost per run | Unlimited developer hours | Per session-minute, predictable |
| Time to build a new workflow | Weeks of flowchart design | Prompt and a credential handle |
| Audit trail | Screenshots, sometimes | Video, DOM diff, HAR, by default |
| SOC 2 / HIPAA | Your security team owns it | Inherited from the runtime |
| Licensing model | Per-bot seats, annual | Usage-based, scale to zero |
| Infrastructure footprint | Windows VM per bot | Firecracker microVM per session |
Invoice reconciliation, vendor onboarding, SOX-controlled journal entries — with a replay attached to every action.
Portal logins, claim submissions, and denial workflows with HIPAA-safe credential handling.
Ticket triage, SaaS admin, and account provisioning across any web console your employees use.
Regulator portals, tax filings, disclosure workflows. Audit-ready by default.
Carrier portals, broker sites, customs pages. The back-office web your ERP does not cover.
Benefits enrollment, payroll reconciliation, offboarding checklists across SaaS tools.
We meet your RPA center of excellence where it lives. Your existing flowchart becomes the agent's structured plan; your existing credentials move into the vault; your existing compliance controls map to our audit trail. No rip-and-replace.
We ran the numbers against building this ourselves. It would have taken three engineers eighteen months and we still would not have had the replay viewer.
Role-based access on the vault and on replay viewing. Maker / checker workflows via webhook handoff.
Every agent prompt and tool update version-controlled, with a replay on every canary run.
Replay + audit log + HAR covers the screenshots-and-logs requirement in almost every regulated framework.
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and optional BAA. One subprocessor to review, not a fleet of desktop agents.
Yes. Your flowcharts and SOPs become the structured context for the agent. We help translate them in the discovery phase.
We focus on browser workloads. Desktop work still lives better on traditional RPA for now; most teams end up with a hybrid during transition.
Every auditor we have worked with has — and many prefer it to the screenshot-per-step model. We are happy to join a call and walk through it.
Pick three workflows. We will have one running in a pilot tenant in a month.